Republicans and the one-drop rule, or “He’s too moderate!”
So, scholars of social identity and oppression have long known that the boundaries of and membership in privileged groups is incredibly tightly controlled. Gay men aren’t fully or properly masculine, just as those with even one drop of non-white blood aren’t really white. (Hypodescent, aka “the one drop rule”, was a former US law which dictated that anyone with “one drop” – i.e., 1/64th – of black blood was legally black). Similarly, women aren’t generally punished for acting somewhat masculine, but men are severely punished (via teasing, disapproval, violence even) for acting even a bit feminine. Privileged groups are interested in maintaining rigorous purity among their ranks.
So, this makes the Cheney/Rove/Limbaugh (notably, all white straight dudes, as far as we know) wing of the GOP’s approach to party identity and ideology reeeeally interesting. As the NYT article discusses, Cheney et al are trying to purge the moderate likes of Colin Powell out of the GOP. Read more here:
Anyway, it seems like Cheney/Rove/Limbaugh et al are trying to fashion the identity of the Republican party in the same terms that priviliged social identities like heteromasculinity and whiteness are formed. Republicans with even one drop of moderate blood aren’t “real” Republicans. In this model, the GOP can include only those who are most ideologically pure.
Now, I’m not going to make any causal claims here. I don’t think we can say whether or not it is because the leaders of this extremely right wing of the party are (as far as we know) straight white dudes that they’re adopting this model of group identity. We can’t say that they’re explicitly modeling GOP identity on white or heteromasculine identity — in fact, they probably aren’t even consciously aware of hypodescent or normative masculinity as such. However, we can speculate about the correlation, and wonder if this sort of purity in group identity is appealing to white males b/c it aligns wiht how they experience their own identities.
here’s that link…sorry!
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/25/us/25talkshows.html?ref=politics
Whatever identity questions may motive them, these guys are doing a disservice to the country and to their own party. “Ideological purity” is both undesirable and probably impossible in any group of more than a few dozen people in our liberal democracy. (That’s “liberal” with a small “l” in the broad historical sense.)
Ideological purity is an unhealthy aim for any political party in our system. Compatibility, yes. Purity, no. If they cannot tolerate internal debate among loyal, competent party members with compatible ideologies, they will never be able to stake credible claim to the label “loyal opposition”, worthy of the respect that allows them to be heard in constructive discourse by those with more pronounced ideological differences.
Perhaps respect and constructive discourse are not what interests them.
@ doug:
I know, right? That position is so manifestly bad that you really have to wonder what motivates it. What makes Cheney et al think this is a good idea? SO this post is maybe a teeny part of a response to that question.
.
There is actually no such thing as a so-called “Light-Skinned
Black” person … but rather … such individuals and groups
are actually people who are of a ‘Multi-Generational
Multiracially-Mixed’ (MGM-Mixed) Lineage that some may
have been pressured or encouraged to ignore or downplay.
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4160
.
People of Mixed-Race lineage should NOT feel pressured to
‘identify’ according to any standards other than one’s own.
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4157
.
The legal -application of the racist-‘One-Drop Rule’
(ODR) was banned in the U.S. way back in 1967.
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4162
.
http://www.facebook.com/groups/253286018082418/permalink/253341891410164
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4187
.
http://www.facebook.com/groups/253286018082418/permalink/253341281410225
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
Listed below are related Links of ‘the facts’ of the histories
of various Mixed-Race populations found within the U.S.:
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
There is no proof that a ‘color-based slave hierarchy’
(or that ‘color-based social-networks’) ever existed
as common entities — within the continental U.S.
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4154
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4153
.
It was the ‘Rule of Matriliny (ROM) — [a.k.a. ‘The Rule of Partus’
(ROP)] — and NOT the racist-‘One-Drop Rule’ (ODR) — that was
used to ‘create more enslaved people’ on the continental U.S.
.
This is because the chattel-slavery system that was
once found on the antebellum-era, continental U.S.
was NOT “color-based” (i.e. “racial”) — but rather
— it was actually “mother-based” (i.e. ‘matrilineal’).
.
http://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts/posts/309460495741441
.
There were many ways (and not solely the sexual assault
and sexual exploitation of the women-of-color) in which
‘white’ lineage entered the familial bloodlines of
enslaved-people found on the continental U.S.
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4238
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4239
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4240
.
An ‘Ethnic’ category is NOT the
same thing as a “Race” category:
.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Generation-Mixed/message/4236
.
http://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts/posts/300777016632181
.
Other Topics:
.
https://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts/posts/279223868853420
.
https://www.facebook.com/allpeople.gifts/posts/164203590359746
.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/%C2%ADallpeople-gifts/the-facts-on-m%C2%ADixed-race/321878451159708
.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.